Building on our core strength of detailed building analysis, we have supported over 90 K-12 school districts and community colleges with saving energy, reducing utility costs, increasing student and staff comfort, and improving the learning environment.
Close District collaboration is critical to our philosophy in developing, selecting, and implementing successful energy projects. Prior to site visits and analysis, we gather gather insights, priorities, and constraints from key stakeholders. We engineer success by focusing our efforts on opportunities that are most likely to be implemented with a suitable magnitude of potential savings, while documenting other possible measures for future consideration.
Our team will review background information on each facility such as:
We will also benchmark each site, analyzing energy use and comparing it to similar schools with similar climates.
We develop an initial measures list (IML) to be approved by District staff that identifies energy savings opportunities in the District. Once vetted, we select calculation methodologies to fit each project’s requirements, timeline and budget.
For sites benefiting from an in-depth energy analysis, we conduct a full site energy audit based on an approved IML. Our audit reports are actionable, providing background facility information and proposed energy measures with required steps for implementation.
We research projects and recommend options based on economics, ease of installation, simplicity, and level of site disruption. We always included the Saving to Investment Ratio (SIR), as required in Prop 39 Energy Expenditure Plans, as an excellent (and required) means for evaluating energy efficiency measures. Additionally we consider Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) and Value Engineering (VE) as important criteria in economic analysis.
Working for utility incentive programs since 2001, we are intimately aware of incentive program dynamics. We identify funding opportunities and compile application documentation. Working with utility representatives, we ensure a swift and fair review of project documents. Our job is to maximize potential rebate and incentive funds available to your District in conjunction with other potential Prop 39 funding opportunities.
After completing our energy analysis, we work with the District to develop the Energy Expenditure Plan (EEP) for submission to the CEC. We consider the following criteria such as:
When engaged for project support, we provide the following services and resources necessary for successful project implementation, completion and verification and work with you to identify to most cost-effective and attractive competitive bids.
We have extensive experience commissioning energy projects within a vast variety of installations, including K-12 school facilities. Our commissioning approach ensures the systems and controls are operating (and communicating) per design intent and facility staff are properly trained on the new systems. We develop thorough yet clear and concise commissioning plans, communicate the plan to all parties, conduct on-site and remote testing of systems, and present all findings to the District in comprehensive final reports.
Within roughly two years of receipt of Prop 39 funding, Districts are required to submit a Final Project Completion Report to the CEC. As the District technical consultant, we develop and submit the Final Proposition 39 Project Completion Report to the CEC.
With the CEC’s August 1, 2017 deadline for Energy Expenditure Plan submissions, time is quickly running out for K-12 public schools, local educational agencies, and community colleges to apply for California’s Proposition 39 funding. Our Founder and President Jim Kelsey answers some questions districts might have about this funding in his interview with Green Technology Magazine.